Insight and news on web strategy, planning and marketing.
This Month
April 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30
Year Archive
Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
View Article  Encouraging anecdotal signs in social media

Talk about how social media is gaining traction often focuses on the hard data that prove business value, or focuses on case studies and research that demonstrate best practices or key trends.

 

In my role, I’m privileged to interact with people from across North America who are thinking about how best to evaluate and deploy the new social media tools, which provides a useful set of anecdotal experiences to complement the data.

 

And three recent exchanges demonstrate very encouraging signs about how people are using the efficiencies of social media to create value; how consumer applications are revealing business value; and that grassroots knowledge is receiving support by enlightened leadership.

 

Social value

One of the truly exciting features of social media is that it provides easy-to-use technology that enables people to be much more efficient at interacting with one another. It’s a simple concept, but every day brings a surprising new example of how it works.

 

For instance, the other day a colleague showed me Trapster running on his iPhone. Trapster is a mobile application that lets you see and share the location of speed traps right on your mobile phone or GPS device. When you see a trap, users report it by pressing a button on their phone, or calling a toll free number. Other user's phones will alert them as they approach the trap. Trapster incorporates crowd sourcing principles by learning the credibility of traps based on how many users agree. It also learns the credibility of each user, over time.

 

Is this a new way of interacting with one another? No, motorists have flashed their headlights to alert fellow drivers to speed traps for decades. But now a socially-minded driver can reach potentially millions of other drivers rather than a handful.

 

It also demonstrates how social media creates a value proposition that vastly exceeds the older technology it replaces. In this case, Trapster is not only more effective than a radar detector, it’s also tolerated by the police. The application’s website quotes Bill Johnson, Executive director of the National Association of Police Organizations, as saying: “If someone slows down because of it, it's accomplishing the same goal of trying to get people to obey the speed limit."

 

Consumer apps reveal business value

One of the genuinely fascinating aspects of our projects that focus on bringing social media into the enterprise—often called intranet 2.0—is observing how consumer grade software is challenging organizations to improve internal functionality for their employees.

 

Last week, I conducted a business requirement interview with a Vice President of one of our clients, a multi-national financial services company that is assessing how to improve their intranet. “Building in the capability to add widgets is smart,” he observed. “I would take advantage of that, but I have an iPhone with 24 apps. If we advertised internally that there are 24 apps, that would engage staff, even if it was a simple weather forecaster or what’s for lunch in the cafeteria.”

 

Not that along ago, a common complaint from younger workers was the executives don’t “get” new technology because they don’t use it. Increasingly, executives are starting to use the technology, and rapidly perceive how it can add value to their businesses.

 

Grassroots knowledge, enlightened leadership

Successful social media deployments require knowledge and commitment at the grassroots level to understand the technology and put it to good use. My experience, supported by data, suggests that the grassroots is often ahead of the organization’s leadership, which causes that important energy to be dissipated.

 

Last week, I met an IT Director with a large healthcare organization that is developing a new web strategy to support an important development in the organization’s direction. Healthcare entities often perceived to be trailing their users in the utilization of innovative online technology, but this Director was already anticipating how the organization’s clients would want to interact with them using mobile technology, and showed me how he uses Digg on his iPhone to follow the Linux community in which he participates.

 

The organization was also experiencing a common phenomenon for large entities: an employee had started a Facebook group in which employees were discussing the organization’s new direction.

 

A new, 50-something CEO had just come on board, and there was curiosity about what tone he would set for the web strategy. The questions were answered when he requested a blog on his first day, and joined the Facebook group.

 

A boomer CEO of a supposedly conservative organization participating actively in social media is an anecdotal data point that promises we are about to see some exciting new developments in the deployment of social media.

 

FREE WEBINAR

Measuring Intranet Success in the Real World. April 30th, 12 EST. Register today.

View Article  Healthcare catches the social media bug

Even if you don’t work in healthcare, there’s a good chance you’ll be following recent health Web 2.0 developments with interest. The Medpedia Project, for example, will bring a wikipedia approach to health information, and Google Health, the personal ...   more »

View Article  Google extending value proposition to health

For the increasing number of healthcare consumers who appreciate the value of finding relevant health content, a recent article in the New York Times, Google and Microsoft look to change healthcare, offers hopeful insights into how the tech giants plan to enable people to make smarter choices about their health habits and medical care.

 

The article also provides helpful insights for those who must construct online strategies for their organizations, especially when bringing an established value proposition to a new market.

 

Controlling health content

Steve Lohr, the Time reporter, writes that:

 

The Google and Microsoft initiatives would give much more control to individuals, a trend many health experts see as inevitable. “Patients will ultimately be the stewards of their own information,” said John D. Halamka, a doctor and the chief information officer of the Harvard Medical School.

 

Already the Web is allowing people to take a more activist approach to health. According to the Harris survey, 58 percent of people who look online for health information discussed what they found with their doctors in the last year.

 

It is common these days, Dr. Halamka said, for a patient to come in carrying a pile of Web page printouts. “The doctor is becoming a knowledge navigator,” he said. “In the future, health care will be a much more collaborative process between patients and doctors.”

 

Microsoft and Google are hoping this will lead people to seek more control over their own health records, using tools the companies will provide. Neither company will discuss their plans in detail. But Microsoft’s consumer-oriented effort is scheduled to be announced this fall, while Google’s has been delayed and will probably not be introduced until next year, according to people who have been briefed on the companies’ plans.

 

A user defined value proposition

While we can only speculate at this stage on Google’s health plans, it’s a safe bet that the company will continue to extend its well established value proposition.

 

Google’s breakthrough was PageRank, a method of using the link structure of the web, rather than just the characteristics of documents, to provide better search results. Google’s databases maintain billions of pages and employ a proprietary alogorithm to "score" the relevancy of websites for each search query. The highest ranking, or "most relevant" websites for a specific query are listed first in the search results.

 

But Google does not define its value proposition in terms of technical functionality, it expresses it in terms of user experience, according to Tim Armstrong, its VP of Advertising: “Our search index is the value proposition that we offer to our users. The reason people come back to Google every day … is that we offer them non-paid, relevant information, both quickly and totally objectively.” That simple message, based on a clear understanding of customer experience, has provided the company with its growth opportunities in advertising, he adds.

 

The Time article also demonstrates that its value proposition is leading the company into health, because Google is the default starting point for most health searches. “And people are increasingly turning to their computers and the Web for health information and advice. A Harris poll, published last month, found that 52 percent of adults sometimes or frequently go to the Web for health information, up from 29 percent in 2001.”

 

Related items

EHR enhances the doctor-patient relationship
View Article  EHR enhances the doctor-patient relationship

A new report form the Annals of Family Medicine finds that the computer, if used well by a skilled physician, can enhance the patient-doctor relationship.

 

Physicians, Patients, and the Electronic Health Record: An Ethnographic Analysis finds that when used,  the electronic health record (EHR -  the medical record, patient education materials, and Internet search capabilities) can add a valued dynamic to the patient relationship and enhance therapeutic relationships.

 

However, the computer can weaken the patient-doctor relationship if the physician uses it as a substitute for dialogue with the client. Therefore, it depends on ‘how’ the doctor uses the computer.

 

Whether the computer enhances or weakens the relationship depends both on how easy it is to use and how skilled physicians are in making use of it.

 

These conclusions were derived from a study of participant observation (80 hours) in 4 primary care offices and individual interviews with 23 physicians, 52 patient and other support works. This was accompanied by 5 focus-groups of participants.

 

"Physicians were often conflicted between recording data in the EHR and giving patients one-on-one attention," wrote the study's authors, led by William Ventres of Multnomah County Health Department in Portland, Ore.

 

Ventres (et all) found four key factors in influencing this relationship:

 

  • Spatial Factors - for example, how the physical location of the computer monitor influenced dialogue between the patient and doctor (“Large, fixed monitors located in the corner of the examination room caused consternation among both physicians and patients, whereas flat-screen monitors on mobile arms were universally praised.)
  • Relational Factors - how doctors and patients used and perceived the computer. "There are times where it’s obvious you’re going through a structured way of dealing with a presenting problem. It’s click, click, point, and your note is done. Then there are these much more complex, human interactions. It just isn’t appropriate to be sitting there typing at the time,” was a quote offered by one of the study’s participant doctors.
  • Educational Factors – how skilled and experienced the doctor in using the computer and EHR.
  • Structural Factors - factors such as the cost and funding for EHR, and how the host organization (e.g. clinic or hospital) perceived and influenced (culture) the use of EHR.

RELATED ITEMS:

EHRs Enter Patient-Doctor Relationships